-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
Network-25396: Conditional Access policies enforce strong authentication for private apps #744
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR adds a new security assessment test (ID: 25396) that validates whether Conditional Access policies enforce strong authentication methods for Private Access applications within Microsoft Entra Global Secure Access.
Key changes:
- Implements comprehensive test logic to evaluate Private Access applications (both Per-app and Quick Access types) for CA policy coverage requiring MFA or authentication strength
- Introduces sophisticated authentication strength classification (Phishing-Resistant, Passwordless MFA, MFA baseline)
- Provides detailed reporting with manual review capability for apps protected via applicationFilter-based policies
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/powershell/tests/Test-Assessment.25396.ps1 | New test function that queries Private Access apps, evaluates CA policy coverage, classifies authentication strength levels, and generates detailed compliance reports with pass/fail/investigate status |
| src/powershell/tests/Test-Assessment.25396.md | Documentation explaining security risks of unprotected private apps and providing remediation guidance with links to Microsoft Learn articles |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
alexandair
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@praneeth-0000 Please, address my feedback.
Hi @alexandair , I've updated the logic for classifying phishing resistant auth level. You were right, according to updated docx, all combinations in allowedCombinations should have at least 1 phishing resistant method. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 6 comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Added test for 25396
Conditional Access policies enforce strong authentication for private apps